Excalibar Tune Up
Here are some emails I received on the Excalibar and my replies to them explaining the solutions as I see them.
1. Question
Three weeks ago I ordered a Excalibur 19". Upon first use I noticed the top arm was bent to the left if looking at the front. I traded it for a 30". The 19" had horrible vibration and knocking noises. I attempted some puzzles on the 30" The wood was being picked up in straight cuts and more so in corners. After measuring and checking I noticed that the front to back movement was excessive. Sommerville claims the front to back movement is only .026" which is less than 1/32", mine is moving more. So I was now told to look at the rocker arm and struts. First I made sure the top strut was parallel with the upper arm. Once this had been done I noticed that the lower strut and rocker arm were not parallel, but was upward. After attempting to adjust the lower arm I found I could not get both struts and rocker arms perfectly parallel with one another. I also noticed something worse; a slight twist to the upper arm and blade wobble of 1/32" (left to right). I have four pictures included, one showing the blade tracking problem which I think is caused by the upper arm twist and a Starrett square next to the upper arm showing the rightward twist of the arm. I'm no expert on scroll saw mechanics, especially one as complicated and easily damaged as the Ex 30. What would you do in my circumstances?
Answer to 1
I have looked at my saw and can't see much of a way the arm can get out of
line. But there is a way the blade can be off line
like you show. Where you are showing the blade is moving left and
right, the clamps need adjusted. Run the blade down , place a ruler on the side
of the blade. Hold the ruler, run the blade up. Yours seem to be the blade is
moving off to the right. Loosen the top blade clamp, then using an
allen wrench to back the allen screw out on the left side of the clamp. This
will allow the top of the blade to move over to the left when you tighten the
clamp on the blade. You may need to do the opposite to the bottom clamp to help
take up excess error if needed. When you can run the blade up and down without
the blade moving side to side, the clamps are set right to make
the blade run true to the arms. Now set the table to be square to the blade Now
check your arms to the table again and see if that fixes your alignment problem.
The way your blade is currently running off it would cause the lift you are
talking about. Once the blade is trued up to the movement of the arms, your lift
problem should be OK.
From Seyco: Just a side note on the arm support tubing being out-of-square. In assembly the factory aligns the rocker arms that hold the blade and not the tubing, so the actual sawing is obviously not affected.
Extra comments on this matter:
From Seyco:
As stated previously, I
am proud we finally got a saw to you that was
> aligned and working to your satisfaction. Thank you for the e-mail stating
> this. The remaining question I have is--
> "Has SEYCO resolved the problems/issues you had with your Seyco/Excalibur
> purchase?"
> THANKS, Ray
Reply:
Yes everything is good.
2. Question
I have a few simple questions about the Excalibur 30 Rick.
My questions are in response to the blade clamps. I don't understand the engineering as much as I would like. I have learned most of what I know from either you or Patrick S. and his books.
My
questions are regarding blade suspension. On many saws the blade is allowed to
pivot at the blade clamps, i.e. Hegner's knife edge clamps.
Should
the blade clamp blocks be square with the top and bottom of the table on my
Excalibur?
So
is the surface where the red arrow is pointing supposed to be square with the
table on top and bottom for the blade to remain straight? Is the blade supposed
to pivot inside the blade clamps after being tightened? Because Ray told me that
the suspension is rigid and the way they are mounted on the rocker arms allows
them to stay parallel with the table.
Hopefully
I phrased the questions correctly.
The reason I asked the above is because the lower clamping surface is not parallel with the table. To me this would cause the blade to have more front to back movement than it should. But then again I am probably being too picky with the engineering.
Answer to 2